| shahadat119 |
|
|
 |
| Do³±czy³: 05 Mar 2024 |
| Posty: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The Federal Supreme Court will judge an appeal discussing the validity of the criteria adopted by Banco do Brasil to readjust debts arising from rural loans in March , when the Collor I Plan was implemented. By majority vote, the The court, in a virtual session, recognized the existence of general repercussions (Theme ,) in the extraordinary appeal that deals with the matter.
reproduction
Central Bank is one of the authors of the appeal judged by the Supreme Court
The Superior Court of Justice accepted appeals from the Federal Public Ministry (MPF), the Brazilian Rural Society and the Rio Grande do Sul Rice Growers Association to declare that the monetary correction index applicable to rural credit notes in the month of March , whose contracts establish indexation to savings account indexes, was the variation in BTN Fiscal (%).
With the Collor I Plan, savings account balances that BTC Number Data exceeded thousand cruises were collected from the Central Bank and began to be monetarily updated based on the variation in the Fiscal BTN. It turns out that Banco do Brasil, instead of applying this percentage that remunerated almost all deposits in savings accounts, applied the IPC of March (%) to the accounts for loans to farmers.
At the STJ, Banco do Brasil, the Union and the Central Bank of Brazil were ordered to pay the differences between the IPC of March and the BTN fixed in the period to borrowers who effectively paid by updating the financing using an illegal index.
In their appeal to the STF, the banking institutions and the Union claimed, among other points, that the Plenary of the Supreme Court, when considering RE , judged that the IPC of % is the applicable index for the monetary correction of passbook deposits savings that remained available in financial institutions in March |
|
